If your Looking for Real Estate With Lake Koocanusa Access, Call Ten Lakes Realty Agent Sherry A. Cox Today, She is Your Hometown Advantage. 406-297-7767 or email Sherry at Sherry@SherryCox.com
Eureka Montana Real Estate
4 Bedroom - 2 Bath Custom Home on 5 Acres
Eureka Montana Real Estate
Eureka Montana Real Estate
406-882-4177
This is a NoN-MLS offering
so Your The first to Know
so Your The first to Know
Eureka Montana Real Estate for Sale
Eureka Montana Real Estate
200 acres for Sale with grave creek Frontage, mountain views, pasture and timber mix. Horse property, 2 wells, 4 car garage, homestead property.
www.TenLakesRealty.com
www.TenLakesRealty.com
Internet Marketing
Folks the Yellow Pages are dead, Billboards are not effective in a global market,
newspapers are not where your potential buyers or clients are looking for you.
It is Time to Embrace the Internet for Marketing You, your real estate, your goods and services. The Internet is here to stay, you may need a marketing makeover for your business. You definately need to BE FOUND on the Internet for Your Northwest Montana Business.
Real Estate Marketing
Attention: Eureka Montana Homeowners
TenLakesRealty.com and NorthwestMontanaPublishing.com announce FREE Real Estate Marketing on the Internet for Your Eureka Montana Real Estate. This service is only for Eureka - which would include what we all know to be Eureka (Rexford, West Kootenia, Trego, Fortine ) We are number one in Internet Marketing for Northwest Montana. Check Out www.TenLakesRealty.com for details or go direct to the Eureka FSBO page at... http://www.tenlakesrealty.com/eurekamontanafsbo
Subdivision Tidbits
Growth Updates
Barnaby Heights Subdivision
Lincoln County Meeting Minutes
1:45 PM: Barnaby Heights, 44 Residential Lots, Public Hearing, NW1/4 Sec 28, T35N, R26W: Present were Robert Starling, Lloyd Bridges, Andy Belski, Jerre Johnson, Kris Caister, Ginny Emerson, G K Hanson, Larry Wilke, Bonnie Dittmer, Rich Deucher, Al Longacre, Kate Longacre, Connie Schreier, Don Truman and Darrel Zauner.
Mary submitted the subdivision and conditions and recommendations. .Mary also read three letters. The first is from the Secretary of the Trego/ Fortine/ Stryker Fire Department, Jennifer Persson. The second is from Rod Lingerfelt an adjacent land owner. The third is a letter from Catherine M. Longacre, adjacent land owner. Mary also addressed two letters from David Harman, attorney, written to Ken Peterson, County Planner in 2006, which concerned the width of the road not being 60’ for the entire length of the road. Rita asked Andy Belski to show how the traffic will get through the 30’ part safely. Andy drew a map showing that the driving surface would always be 24’ even in the part where the easement is smaller. Kate Longacre asked about the road issue. Lloyd Bridges asked the reasoning behind the 60’ easement. Al Longacre was concerned that the community septic and sewage system would be just north of his water well. He wondered if
easements already existed concerning this. Mary explained that it would have to be within County Guidelines to pass as a septic and sewage system.
Jerry Johnson, a land consultant told that the sewer systems will be up to standards according to state laws which is 100 yards from a water well. Rich Deucher asked Jerry how he can figure the drain fields before you know the size of the homes. Jerry said that they use an average home of 4 bedrooms. Kate Longacre wanted to know if there has been a study to see if there is sufficient water in the area. Jerry stated that the State monitors wells and can make landowners go deeper or make larger lots to find sufficient water. He then explained the requirements for a single family dwelling well. Commissioner Windom asked if there has been a consideration to size of lawn due to water issues. Andy stated that they had not addressed that yet because they haven’t found out how much water they have. Larry Wilke asked if they planning a community water system. Jerry answered yes with typically 2 wells. Al Longacre brought up the issue of one egress and one regress and asked how residents would protect themselves if there was a fire that blocked the road. Mary explained that current subdivision laws don’t require 2 exits in a loop subdivision like this
Al wanted to know how the county allowed the roads to be put in and the land logged. Mary explained that a landowner can do what they want on their own property and it is not a subdivision at this time. Kate asked if Mary had the authority to stop them had it been a subdivision. Mary said that the new subdivision laws that have yet to be adopted will have some language to help with this. Ginny Emerson wanted to know if it would do them any good to call the sheriffs department. Mary said no, the sheriff’s office would not be involved as no laws are being broken. The Commissioners ended the
public hearing for today at 2:33 PM. They will continue the public hearing on May 30, in Libby at 2:00 in the Commissioner’s office.
old Sinclair Creek Road
I am not sure how many of you have followed this story but it looks like it has come to a conclusion. Here is the meeting minutes from May 16th 2007 on the issue.
11:30 AM: Decision on Road Abandonment petition for Old Sinclair Creek Road:
Commissioner Windom introduced herself and Commissioner Roose and said that Commissioner Konzen was on County business in Minnesota. Commissioner Windom read the document from the County Attorney. She said that this is not a public hearing. The public hearing had already taken place on this issue. The commissioners did allow landowners from the area to reiterate the opinions they had said at the public hearing. Commissioner Roose moved that the commissioners accept the County Attorney’s opinion and not abandon the Old Sinclair Creek Road according to the law. Commissioner Windom seconded and it was so ordered.
11:30 AM: Decision on Road Abandonment petition for Old Sinclair Creek Road:
Commissioner Windom introduced herself and Commissioner Roose and said that Commissioner Konzen was on County business in Minnesota. Commissioner Windom read the document from the County Attorney. She said that this is not a public hearing. The public hearing had already taken place on this issue. The commissioners did allow landowners from the area to reiterate the opinions they had said at the public hearing. Commissioner Roose moved that the commissioners accept the County Attorney’s opinion and not abandon the Old Sinclair Creek Road according to the law. Commissioner Windom seconded and it was so ordered.
This affects you all. I have seen several times where someone comes up with a document that claims to have a road through your property and there is nothing you can do. When buying property folks, look closely and TAKE NO ONES WORD for it. The road may be grown over, it may not show up on your title report, but a future document can surface that gives the county or some other party access over your property. Also remember ROADs are good for subdividing, a new
developer may need your property for access to their subdivision and POLITICS
says they WILL get it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
